Chat hot isreal woman web cam free
The missiles used in the attack, the Tomahawk, can use any combination of three guidance systems: GPS, inertial navigation and terrain mapping.There is no evidence and even no reports that the Russians shot even a single air-defense missile.I do believe in this explanation and I will explain why in the political analysis below.Explanation B: The Russians could not legally shoot down the US missiles.To believe that it would require you to find the following sequence logical: first, Assad pretty much wins the war against Daesh which is in full retreat.Then, the US declares that overthrowing Assad is not a priority anymore (up to here this is all factual and true).There is no way to distinguish a chemical munition or a chemical attack by means of radar.Whatever option you chose, the Syrian government is obviously and self-evidently innocent of the accusation of having used chemical weapons. Also, and just for the record, the US had been considering exactly such a false flag attack in the past.
That would make it possible for Trump to appear tough while not inflicting the kind of damage which would truly wreck his plans to collaborate with Russia.Frankly, if you believe any of that, you should immediately stop reading and go back to watching TV.For the rest of us, there are three options: airbase.There are other possibilities such as an directed energy beams which basically fries or, at least, confuses the terrain following and or inertial navigation systems.Some have suggested a “kill switch” which would shut down the entire missile. Again, this really doesn’t matter for our purposes.